Saturday, November 28, 2009
More Random Pics
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Snowy Valley
Yesterday morning's view when we got up....
Beautifully frosted trees....
Da Wolf in the snow....he Lurvs the snow!
Snow sitting on the garden fence wire....
Sphere: Related Content
Monday, November 23, 2009
It's All About the Hair (Uhhh...No, It's Not!)
The chemo has jammed me full on into menopause...oh lucky lucky me! So I'm flashing all over the place....yuk!
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Strawberry Wine
Now, the bottles are sitting behind the woodstove with the bungs in them.....
Thursday, November 19, 2009
'I want my mammograms!' (CNN)
This is simply unbelievable to me....by the way, I am 48
(The links probably won't work, so head on over to www.cnn.com so you can see them)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CNN) -- A government task force says women in their 40s don't need annual mammograms, but Sara Fought would beg to differ: She says she's alive today because a routine mammogram found cancer when she was 42.
"I had to read the guidelines twice because I really couldn't believe women in the 40-49 age bracket were being discouraged from having mammograms," says Fought, who lives in Chevy Chase, Maryland. "That's foolhardy. They're playing with people's lives."
Fought is one of many breast cancer survivors and doctors who are outraged over the guidelines released Monday by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force advising against routine mammograms for women in their 40s.
The task force doesn't argue that mammograms have saved the lives of many women like Sara Fought. In fact, the task force mentions in its statement that for every 1,000 women in their 40s who receive routine mammograms, two cases of cancer are detected. However, it also notes that 98 women will have "false positives." In other words, the mammogram will pick up something that looks like cancer, but that further testing shows actually is not.
In its statement, the task force wrote that on balance, routine mammograms for women in their 40s aren't worth the downsides, such as false positives and the exposure to a small amount of radiation.
Watch Dr. Gupta answer your questions
The task force recommendations are not government policy, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius says.
Sebelius says the doctors and scientists on the task force "do not set federal policy, and they don't determine what services are covered by the federal government."
Lucy Marion, Ph.D., a nurse practitioner and member of the task force, says she chose not to get regular mammograms when she was in her 40s.
"The benefit is small," Marion says, adding that groups like the American Cancer Society have been overzealous in recommending mammograms to women in their 40s.
Watch an interview between Dr. Gupta and Lucy Marion
Marion, dean of the school of nursing at the Medical College of Georgia, says that while there are women like Fought, there are also women who had bad experiences with mammograms.
"A woman called me today and said, 'Thank goodness for the new guidelines because I've had so many unnecessary biopsies and they have been painful and they've been costly, and I have had to pay for some of them out of pocket, and every time it was benign,' " she says.
"I want to scream, 'No! No!' "
Andrea Evans says she hopes women in their 40s and their doctors will ignore the task force's recommendations.
Watch how other survivors react to the guideline changes
"I want to scream, 'No! No! Don't listen!' " says Evans, whose cancer was detected by a routine mammogram eight years ago when she was 46. "If I hadn't had that mammogram, I wouldn't be here today.
Dr. Rachel Brem, director of breast imaging and intervention at the George Washington University Medical Center, says she's already concerned that women may be canceling their mammograms because of the task force's recommendations.
"Usually we see 26 women in a morning for mammograms, but today we only saw 17. That's a significant decrease," says Brem, adding that she can't be sure the lower number was because of the new guidelines.
She added that while mammograms do sometimes cause needless worry over a false positive, she thinks women are willing to put up with that. "Every single one of my patients would trade a minimal amount of anxiety for an early breast cancer diagnosis any day," she says.
MayoClinic.com: Is it breast cancer? Procedures to evaluate breast lumps
Will insurance still pay?
Dawn Marie Jones, whose cancer was detected by a routine mammogram last year when she was 40, also is "horrified" by the new guidelines.
"I wept when I watched the news last night. I couldn't believe this was real," Jones says.
She says she worries that insurance companies, which pay close attention to the recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, might start refusing to pay for mammograms for women in their 40s based on the new guidelines.
What is the Preventive Services Task force?
"I worry about my little sister. This year she'll be the age that I was when I was diagnosed. It concerns me she might be denied the access I had," she says.
In 20 states, insurance companies are required to pay for mammograms for women over age 40, according to the National Women's Law Center. However, these laws don't apply to women who work for companies that self-insure their policies. Slightly more than half of all Americans who receive insurance through their employer work for a company that self-insures, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
Susan Pisano, a spokeswoman for America's Health Insurance Plans, an insurance industry group, says insurance companies will continue to pay for mammograms for women in their 40s. "If your insurance company won't pay, I think you should go back and challenge them on that," Pisano says.
But Nancy Davenport-Ennis, co-founder of the Patient Advocate Foundation, says she thinks insurance companies will use the guidelines as an opportunity to deny coverage to women in their 40s.
Sebelious disagrees. "I would be very surprised if any private insurance company changed its mammography coverage decisions as a result of this action."
It costs "$640 and up" to get a mammogram when you don't have insurance, according to Paul Keckley, executive director of the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions.
Keckley and other observers think insurance companies will continue to cover mammograms for women in their 40s despite the new recommendations.
"It would be a PR disaster for them to pull back on coverage of breast cancer prevention screening," says Art Caplan, a bioethicist at the University of Pennsylvania. "They're not going to do it. It would be a nightmare."
"Make sure your physician raises hell"
If your insurance company starts refusing to pay for mammograms, Keckley says to get your doctor on your side.
"You should make sure your physician raises hell about it," Keckley advises.
You can also seek a free or reduced price mammogram offered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. The American Cancer Society has a list of free mammogram services by ZIP code, and the American Breast Cancer Foundation provides financial assistance for mammograms.
Fought, who had a mastectomy and chemotherapy after her breast cancer diagnosis, says she hopes women will listen to the American Cancer Society and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, both of which still recommend routine annual mammograms starting at age 40.
"Discouraging women in their 40s is the wrong message to be giving women," she says.
CNN's John Bonifield, Danielle Dellorto, Miriam Falco and Sabriya Rice contributed to this report.
Sphere: Related ContentWednesday, November 18, 2009
My Last Chemo Treatment is Tomorrow
Here's hoping Captain Chemo is on holidays and a gentler, kinder Mrs. Chemo is filling in while he is away....
But....YEAH! I'm on the Last One...damn, gotta be happy about that!!! Sphere: Related Content
Friday, November 13, 2009
Houston, We Have a Problem (The Dreaded Phone Call)
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Getting the Strawberry Beds Ready for Winter
Straw has been Very Hard for us to get this Fall. The local Feed store never did get any in. We went to the Puddle a week ago, and by chance, the Feed store there did have straw....we picked up 3 bales. $6.50 a piece for some extra winter protection....worth it in my book!
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Clean Up Fire
Amazing how quickly things get cleaned up when you have a fire!
Monday, November 9, 2009
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Link Within...The Cool Linky Things at the Bottom of the Post
I like the way it pulls up the old posts and pictures....
http://www.linkwithin.com/learn Sphere: Related Content
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Monsanto Loses Another Day in Court
Key concepts: Monsanto, GMO and Roundup
View on NaturalPedia: Monsanto, GMO and Roundup
Articles Related to This Article: • Monsanto: History of Contamination and Cover-up
• Who and What Is the Monsanto Chemical Corporation?
• South African GMO Crop Failure Highlights Dangers of Food Supply Domination
(NaturalNews) France`s highest court has ruled that Monsanto lied about the safety of its weed killing herbicide Roundup. The decision came just days ago and confirms an earlier court judgment in France finding that Monsanto had falsely advertised Roundup as being "biodegradable" and that it "left the soil clean."
The original case was brought to court in 2001 by several French environmental groups alleging that Roundup's main ingredient, glyphosate, has a classification as "dangerous to the environment" by the European Union. That case drug on for years and finally ended in a ruling against Monsanto in 2007. 1
The GMO giant quickly appealed and that appeal was heard in 2008 in the Lyon court. Monsanto lost that case as well. They appealed again. This time it went to France's Supreme Court; it lost that hearing and now faces fines and nowhere else to go for further appeals.
The court levied a 13,800 Euro fine against the company (about $22,400USD). Monsanto is also looking at continued losses with fourth quarter losses of $233 million (US), mostly due to plummeting sales of the Roundup brand.2 So far, Monsanto has made no public statement about the court`s ruling, but it is also possible that the ruling could mean civil cases from farmers and communities harmed by the false advertising. That could mean millions of dollars more in losses.
Roundup is the world`s best-selling herbicide and is marketed as a weed-killer to both commercial farmers and home owners. Monsanto is also the world`s largest purveyor of genetically modified seeds (GMO seeds). Often, the seeds are sold in conjunction with Roundup, the seeds being modified to be "herbicide tolerant" (HT-ready).
Some have argued that these GM crops and seeds are worse for the environment and could be a real problem. Crop failures of GMO seeds in Africa have highlighted the lack of a crop diversity issue while other studies have found that GM versus non-GM seeds have little or no bearing on higher yields, as seed companies like Monsanto have claimed.
Currently, in the United States, nearly all of our soybean plants and most of our corn crops are now GMO, and most of the seed crops for those plants are Monsanto-owned. In fact, at least 68% of corn and 90% of soy is a GMO (HT-ready) crop in the U.S. now and Monsanto is working hard to make that a fact worldwide.3
Recent decisions, such as this one in France and a court finding in the U.S. earlier this month, as well as a common blockade in many European countries, are pushing back against the Monsanto takeover of our food crops. Other initiatives, such as Shelly Roche`s "Replace Roundup Challenge," are using consumer boycotts to further take it to Monsanto`s pocketbook.4, 5, 6
Resources: 1- BBC News Monsanto guilty in `false ad' row: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8...
2- BBC News Low herbicide sales hit Monsanto: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business...
3 - Huffington Post Racing Towards a Roundup-Ready Food Future: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nancy...
4 - NaturalNews Judge rules GMOs violate environmental law: http://www.naturalnews.com/027177_f...
5 - NaturalNews How to fight back against genetically modified foods: http://www.naturalnews.com/026908_f...
6 - Bytestyle.tv Take the "Replace Roundup" Challenge: http://bytestyle.tv/content/take-re... http://www.naturalnews.com/027352_Monsanto_GMO_Roundup.html Sphere: Related Content
Captain Chemo Kcicked My Caboose to the Curb
Captain Chemo won this round....I've been doing really well with the treatments. Great actually the first two days, when I'm on the special meds. The third day I start folding up like a little rag doll. Gman has to put me in bed, where I stay and sleep and sleep and sleep.
But this time, it wasn't like that. The first two days went OK, but Saturday night, I started going downhill. Too bad because I wanted to go to town and sit in the truck and watch the fireworks....yeah, we missed that. I was sound asleep by the time they started.
Sunday was spent gagging, retching, puking and all those other things that can come along with chemo. OK, Captain Chemo, you win....my defenses are down and I cannot fake it that I am OK. You win, you win...Uncle, Uncle, I muttered over and over, you win.
My stomach felt like it had lead balls rolling around it. My mouth tasted like I had been chewing on a metal flag pole. The only thing I could get down was some chicken broth...
My stomach muscles are still sore....by Monday I felt like I had somewhat rejoined the land of the living. Totally exhausted, couldn't even climb a set of stairs without laying down at the top. But, at least my stomach had settled.
Everyone has their limit, don't they? I mean, we can pretend all we want that we're tough and we can take this and we will beat this...but we're all human. We feel sickness in our bodies just as well as we feel pleasure in our bodies, fitness and illness....
Today physically, I am feeling better. Not great, but better. All I want to get done today is clean my kitchen. This afternoon, I will put a lamb roast in the oven. It'll probably taste like cardboard mixed with wallpaper paste to me, but I'll eat it.
The rest of the day will be spent just...being. I'll nibble on bland food and rest.
Sometimes I think I should only post good things on this blog, but that's not realistic. I have cancer....this IS cancer.
Cancer sucks.... Sphere: Related Content




