Thursday, November 19, 2009

'I want my mammograms!' (CNN)

This is simply unbelievable to the way, I am 48

(The links probably won't work, so head on over to so you can see them)


(CNN) -- A government task force says women in their 40s don't need annual mammograms, but Sara Fought would beg to differ: She says she's alive today because a routine mammogram found cancer when she was 42.

"I had to read the guidelines twice because I really couldn't believe women in the 40-49 age bracket were being discouraged from having mammograms," says Fought, who lives in Chevy Chase, Maryland. "That's foolhardy. They're playing with people's lives."

Fought is one of many breast cancer survivors and doctors who are outraged over the guidelines released Monday by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force advising against routine mammograms for women in their 40s.

The task force doesn't argue that mammograms have saved the lives of many women like Sara Fought. In fact, the task force mentions in its statement that for every 1,000 women in their 40s who receive routine mammograms, two cases of cancer are detected. However, it also notes that 98 women will have "false positives." In other words, the mammogram will pick up something that looks like cancer, but that further testing shows actually is not.

Video: Viewers question mammograms

Video: Mammogram debate grows

Video: New mammogram rules

In its statement, the task force wrote that on balance, routine mammograms for women in their 40s aren't worth the downsides, such as false positives and the exposure to a small amount of radiation.

Watch Dr. Gupta answer your questions

The task force recommendations are not government policy, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius says.

Sebelius says the doctors and scientists on the task force "do not set federal policy, and they don't determine what services are covered by the federal government."

Lucy Marion, Ph.D., a nurse practitioner and member of the task force, says she chose not to get regular mammograms when she was in her 40s.

"The benefit is small," Marion says, adding that groups like the American Cancer Society have been overzealous in recommending mammograms to women in their 40s.

Watch an interview between Dr. Gupta and Lucy Marion

Marion, dean of the school of nursing at the Medical College of Georgia, says that while there are women like Fought, there are also women who had bad experiences with mammograms.

"A woman called me today and said, 'Thank goodness for the new guidelines because I've had so many unnecessary biopsies and they have been painful and they've been costly, and I have had to pay for some of them out of pocket, and every time it was benign,' " she says.

"I want to scream, 'No! No!' "

Andrea Evans says she hopes women in their 40s and their doctors will ignore the task force's recommendations.

Watch how other survivors react to the guideline changes

"I want to scream, 'No! No! Don't listen!' " says Evans, whose cancer was detected by a routine mammogram eight years ago when she was 46. "If I hadn't had that mammogram, I wouldn't be here today.

Dr. Rachel Brem, director of breast imaging and intervention at the George Washington University Medical Center, says she's already concerned that women may be canceling their mammograms because of the task force's recommendations.

"Usually we see 26 women in a morning for mammograms, but today we only saw 17. That's a significant decrease," says Brem, adding that she can't be sure the lower number was because of the new guidelines.

She added that while mammograms do sometimes cause needless worry over a false positive, she thinks women are willing to put up with that. "Every single one of my patients would trade a minimal amount of anxiety for an early breast cancer diagnosis any day," she says. Is it breast cancer? Procedures to evaluate breast lumps

Will insurance still pay?

Dawn Marie Jones, whose cancer was detected by a routine mammogram last year when she was 40, also is "horrified" by the new guidelines.

"I wept when I watched the news last night. I couldn't believe this was real," Jones says.

She says she worries that insurance companies, which pay close attention to the recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, might start refusing to pay for mammograms for women in their 40s based on the new guidelines.

What is the Preventive Services Task force?

"I worry about my little sister. This year she'll be the age that I was when I was diagnosed. It concerns me she might be denied the access I had," she says.

In 20 states, insurance companies are required to pay for mammograms for women over age 40, according to the National Women's Law Center. However, these laws don't apply to women who work for companies that self-insure their policies. Slightly more than half of all Americans who receive insurance through their employer work for a company that self-insures, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Susan Pisano, a spokeswoman for America's Health Insurance Plans, an insurance industry group, says insurance companies will continue to pay for mammograms for women in their 40s. "If your insurance company won't pay, I think you should go back and challenge them on that," Pisano says.

But Nancy Davenport-Ennis, co-founder of the Patient Advocate Foundation, says she thinks insurance companies will use the guidelines as an opportunity to deny coverage to women in their 40s.

Sebelious disagrees. "I would be very surprised if any private insurance company changed its mammography coverage decisions as a result of this action."

It costs "$640 and up" to get a mammogram when you don't have insurance, according to Paul Keckley, executive director of the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions.

Keckley and other observers think insurance companies will continue to cover mammograms for women in their 40s despite the new recommendations.

"It would be a PR disaster for them to pull back on coverage of breast cancer prevention screening," says Art Caplan, a bioethicist at the University of Pennsylvania. "They're not going to do it. It would be a nightmare."

"Make sure your physician raises hell"

If your insurance company starts refusing to pay for mammograms, Keckley says to get your doctor on your side.

"You should make sure your physician raises hell about it," Keckley advises.

You can also seek a free or reduced price mammogram offered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. The American Cancer Society has a list of free mammogram services by ZIP code, and the American Breast Cancer Foundation provides financial assistance for mammograms.

Fought, who had a mastectomy and chemotherapy after her breast cancer diagnosis, says she hopes women will listen to the American Cancer Society and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, both of which still recommend routine annual mammograms starting at age 40.

"Discouraging women in their 40s is the wrong message to be giving women," she says.

CNN's John Bonifield, Danielle Dellorto, Miriam Falco and Sabriya Rice contributed to this report.

Sphere: Related Content


Carolyn Evans-Dean said...

I had my first mammogram at the age of 37 to establish a baseline. I believe strongly in early detection. After all, my mother's breast cancer was detected because she was extremely vigilant and always got her mammograms on time.That saved her life! Women need better access to mammograms, not less!

Anonymous said...

Perhaps we need to stop checking blood pressure for men until they're 50? Prostates until 90? I yell at the tv every time I see this on the news. If Mary had waited until she's 50 she would never be 50. Her last chemo was last week. Thankfully, she'll be here for her 50th and many more.

Anonymous said...

Such a difficult question. We can all weigh in with opinions and facts, our own stories and those of friends, but in the end it is a personal decision. We need facts, guidelines and funding to help us decide and chose, and then live with our choices.

I have a friend who died of breast cancer less than a year after an all clear mammogram...but then others are saved. No easy answers.

PS lots of the text in this post is not showing up blue against dark blue background.

Linda Foley said...

I think it is a personal choice... I've never had a mammogram. I do feel my boobies though! :)

Annie said...

You're all bringing up good points!

Robin, glad to hear Mary is finishing up her treatments too...we have been wondering how she is doing.

Gardening Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory Gardening Blogroll Center
Protected by Copyscape Duplicate Content Software